Public policy and the social
construction of cyberterror: the hunt for the paper tiger
Abstract:
The social construction
of the computer hacker as dangerous criminal or even terrorist has
serious implications for public policy, human rights and civil liberties.
In the current climate of “counter-terrorism at any cost”
grave infringements of civil liberties would seem easily justified
in the name of national security.
It therefore becomes crucial to investigate systematically the foundations
for social perceptions of the so-called “cyberterrorist”.
The image of the hacker as dangerous criminal or terrorist, so beloved
of the press and promoted tirelessly by the deep pockets of the
information security industry, is critically misleading in this
respect. My study seeks to pick up where others have left off, tracing
the image of the computer hacker as it is transformed from “dangerous
criminal” to “cyberterrorist”. The study will
consider this image as it is presented in the national press, how
this affects thinking and policy-making in government and, finally,
how it translates into the law of England and Wales.
This is a multi-disciplinary study based on an interpretive epistemology.
The theory of moral panic from the reference discipline of sociology
is used as a framework for the content analysis of a sample of UK
press articles on cyberterrorism. Parliamentary materials are examined
separately, using a similar approach.
The expected contributions of this study include: a deeper understanding
of the dialectic between national newspaper coverage and public
policy on the issue of cyberterrorism; consideration of how a better
basis for legislation and regulation might be defined or constructed;
and an analysis of how a sociological theory of mass behaviour might
be an appropriate tool for the examination of socio-cultural questions
relating to information systems.